|
||||||||||
2. How has this year's Y6 progressed from Y2?
The difference between the two graphs is that:
POINT SCORES: Point Score is calculated as Level x 6 + 3
Sub levels of 4 would be:
The graph is available to show overall performance at KS2 and breaks down into individual subjects ie English, Maths and Science. Some of the coefficients used to calculate the CVA are shown in the table below.
The graph is generated for all core subjects at KS2 and also as an overview (APS) of the whole Key Stage At the base of each CVA graph is a conclusion that forms the basis of the new PANDA. This will be used by OFSTED. In the example above it states that “Your school’s value added based on the pupils plotted above is significantly greater than the National Average at the 95% confidence level”. The only other grades offered will be:
The other graph (APS only) available will plot the APS achieved at KS2 against the mark achieved in a specific subject or of the whole Key Stage at KS2 (Fig 2.2).
The crossover to Question Level Analysis by pressing the Show Radar Graph button is not available from the Contextual Graph but is from the APS only graph (Figs 2.3a & 2.3b).
Interpretation of Data At the bottom of each graph produced in the contextual area there is a conclusion drawn which compares the school results with those nationally at the 95% confidence level. This is probably most easily looked at by Generating a report under Reports / School Reports / CVA Report (without options) (See reports at the end of these notes Page): Ready Reckoners Spreadsheets have been prepared by the DfES to enable users to get a view of the effect on VA with individual pupils. These can be found on the www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/performance.PAT website and are free to download and use. It will confirm that the data supplied in the tables, graphs and reports are accurate. The 95% Confidence Interval Level is calculated as follows:
SUMMARY The Contextual Value Added function has been added to PAT to enable schools to compare themselves with others but making allowances for the mix of pupils within the cohort. This is an attempt to level out the discrepancies over the full range of criteria. The function has been tested fully and works well. Clearly time will tell if adjustments need to be made.
There is no cause for alarm. If you have additional material that can be used for the pupils concerned, you can enter it manually under the Edit Pupil Level Data (Pupil Results area) or do an import to gather them. You can obtain a list of these pupils by clicking on the View Report button just above Apply button. The “Not listed” pupils will be found at the bottom of the page (Fig 2.7). Click OK on this message and you will be presented with a graph similar to Fig 2.5:
The report gives an overview of the pupil progress from KS1 to KS2. The summary at the top shows how many pupils have appeared above and below the national median and quartile lines against which they are plotted. The pupils are then arranged conveniently in those groupings with the APS and levels achieved at KS1 together with the aggregated KS2 Marks. Used in conjunction with the graph (Fig 2.3) it can show the co-ordinates where a child can be found. This way the graph can be shown to interested parties (Governors and Parents typically) whilst protecting other pupils’ data. The CVA Report (Fig 2.7a) is similar to the Value Added report except
that it shows the KS2 predicted APS and the KS2 actual APS together
with the levels achieved in all subjects. This is also broken down
into sub-levels.
|
||||||||||
|