|
|
6. Are there any differences between the way boys and girls answered
questions in Maths at KS2?
The parameters will need to be reset to get the data required to answer the question:
Fig 6.3 compares Boys and Girls against the National figures for all pupils (they are not currently split) and against each other within the cohort. By using the filter button the Boys or Girls can be removed from the Graph.
A simple change of Subject will give a view of the English results. It should be noted that there is a great deal more that can be achieved with Question Level Analysis; we will explore that whilst we are in that area of the package.
Helps to Challenge and Inform Teaching Strategy. It is possible to get different views of the way questions have been answered by a given cohort:
Data can be viewed by using:
Additionally it is possible to view: Use the new Drill Button to select the options. It is possible to determine where strengths and weaknesses lie, identify possible causes and give guidance for corrective action. An invaluable aid to SIOs, Head Teachers and Teachers in providing the best possible education to all. REPORTS TAB
Clicking on School Summary Report gives Fig 6.10
It produces Report 6.1 – School Summary Report
This shows the distribution of prior attainment at Key Stage 1 amongst your Key Stage 2 cohort and compares them to national distributions. The solid line shows the distribution of point scores within your school, the broken line shows the national pattern.
The table below provides a summary of performance in terms of 7 Key Stage 1 indicators - Average Point Score, percentage level 2+ and percentage level 2B+ in each of Reading, Writing and mathematics. The charts below show the proportion of pupils reaching each level in 2005 for each of Reading, Writing and mathematics.
The tables below provide a summary of attainment at Key Stage 1 by pupil characteristics. The first column shows the number of pupils, the second is the average point score obtained by pupils within the group.
The table below provides a summary of performance in terms of 4 Key Stage 2 indicators - Average Point Score and percentage level 4+ in each of English, mathematics and science. The charts below show the proportion of pupils reaching each level in 2005 for each of English, mathematics and science.
Value Added Measures The tables below provides a summary of performance based on five value added measures. The first is from the Achievement and Attainment Tables (AAT) and is based on pupil prior attainment only. The second takes into account prior attainment and a range of pupil and school characteristics (contextualised value added*). The final 3 give a contextualised value added score for each of English, mathematics and science. Scores that are significantly different from average are highlighted. Where a change in value added score is significant it is shown by an arrow.
Percentile Rank This table shows the percentile rank of your school score compared to schools nationally. A rank of 5 means your school is in the top 5% of schools nationally. A score of 95 means that your school is in the bottom 5% of schools nationally.
The tables below provide a summary of attainment and Key Stage 1-2 value added and contextualised value added by pupil characteristics. The first column shows the number of pupils, the second is the average point score obtained by pupils within the group. The third uses the methodology of the School & College Achievement and Attainment Tables value added. The final 3 columns show a contextualised value added score. The contextualised value added uses a range of pupil and school characteristics.
The table below illustrates how well pupils progress within subjects in your school by showing how successful the schools has been in moving pupils who started Key Stage 2 at level W, 1, 2c-a, or 3+ to level 4+ by the end of the Key Stage. For English we take the average level of Reading and Writing as the input, for science we use the average of Reading, Writing and mathematics.
The table below shows how well pupils who were above the expected level at Key Stage 2 (i.e. level 3+) progress in your school. Conversions from level 3+ to level 5 that are significantly different from average are highlighted. Pupils at level
Comparisons are drawn using the following bases:
Clicking on School Reports gives Fig 6.10:
Clicking on Pupil Reports gives screen Fig 6.12:
Fig 6.13 below shows the layout of the report. It summarises:
Looks at: o Individual Pupil – Appendix 3(a)
o Individual Classes/Streams – Appendix 3(b)
o Whole Year Groups – Appendix 3(c)
A grouped subject report is an extension of a pupil subject report in that it combines groups of pupils together. An example of a group might be teaching set or SEN stage, where all teaching sets or SEN stages would be compared to each other. An example of the Maths report can be found in appendix 4(a) comparing ethnic group performance. An additional report has been added recently which shows the progress of a pupil between key stages. The Pupil Tracking Report Shows progress (including Optional Years) between Key Stages.
Produces the report in explorer and shows a graph of the progress
together with progression data at each stage. Try pressing the
buttons and viewing the reports. Contextual Value-Added (CVA) Report [unnamed school] Key Stage 1 (2001) - Key Stage 2 (2005) Table 1: School-Level CVA Score
The school's CVA measure takes into account the following
factors: Report 1.1 – CVA Report (without Options) – Key Stage 2-3 By producing the report with options, all pupils are listed. A copy of these to spreadsheet can confirm all the figures. The school on Report 1.1 has achieved an overall APS of 29.95 (a) against a predicted figure using the Contextual data of 28.35 (b); a difference of 1.6 (a-b). The expectation nationally is that the difference (Average Pupil Value Added) should fall between +/- 0.70 (at the 95% Confidence Interval Level). Because this result falls above those levels, the is school is placed in the band that is “significantly above the national average”, having taken all the contextual data into account. Had the difference (a-b) been between 27.65 and 29.05 then there would have been “no significant difference from the national average”. Had the figure have been less than 27.65, the school would have been “significantly below the national average” being below the +/- 0.70 allowed by the 95% confidence level. The Shrunken value-added referred to is an additional coefficient used to contextualize based around the confidence levels of variable cohort sizes. Smaller cohorts may not represent an average distribution of ability. There is an excellent Tutorial supplied with PAT and also some contextual help is available.
Absolute Admin Tel: 07789 717 021
|
|
|